EL FENOTIPO EXTENDIDO. EL GEN COMO LA UNIDAD DE SELECCIÓN. DAWKINS, RICHARD. Published by CAPITÁN SWING, ESPAÑA, ISBN . Title, EL FENOTIPO EXTENDIDO. EL GEN COMO LA UNIDAD DE SELECCIÓN. Author, Richard Dawkins. Translated by, Pedro Pacheco González. Publisher. El gen egoï¿½sta extendido [Richard Dawkins] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
|Published (Last):||22 October 2013|
|PDF File Size:||19.77 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.18 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Dawkins, unlike other science writers, is forthright dawkinns declaring his advocacy in writing this book. It’s a refreshing start to his most serious effort. After publication of The Selfish Gene led to a storm of fatuous criticism, Extended Phenotype comes in response with more detail of how the gene manifests itself in the organism and its environment. It’s clear that Dawkins’ critics, who label him an “Ultra-Darwinist” [whatever that is] haven’t read this book.
His critics frequently argue that The Selfish Gene doesn’t operate in a vacuum, but must deal within some kind of environment, from an individual cell to global scenarios. Dawkins deftly responds to critics in describing dawkina genes rely on their environment for successful extendivo. If the replication ricahrd survive in the environment it finds itself, then it, and perhaps its species, will die out. The child’s favourite question, “why” is difficult enough for parents and teachers to answer.
Yet, as thinking humans we’ve become trained to deal with that question nearly every context. So well drilled that we consider something for which that question has no answer etxendido be suspicious if not insidious.
Part of Dawkins presentation here reiterates that there is no “why” to either the process of evolution nor its results. It isn’t predictable, inevitable or reasonable. It’s a tough situation to cope with, but Dawkins describes the mechanism with such precision and clarity, we readily understand “how” if not “why” evolution works. We comprehend because Dawkins does such an outstanding job in presenting its mechanics.
This edition carries three fine finales: Dawkins well thought out bibliography, a glossary, and most prized, indeed, an Afterword by Daniel C. If any defense of fenoitpo book is needed, Dennett is a peerless champion for the task.
Dennett’s capabilities in logical argument are superbly expressed here. Excepting the more obstinate ones, these seem to be falling by the wayside.
It’s almost worthwhile reading Dennett’s brief essay before starting Dawkins. It would be a gift to readers beyond measure if these two ever collaborated on a book. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving….
Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Refresh and try again.
Open Preview See a Problem? Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. He proposes that we richad at evolution as a battle between genes instead of between whole organisms.
We can then view changes in phenotypes—the end products of genes, like eye color or leaf shape, which are usually considered to increase the fitness of richarc individual—as serving the evolutionary interests of genes. This influential and controversial book illuminates the complex world of genetics in an engaging, lively manner. Paperbackpages. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask dawkisn readers questions about The Extended Phenotypeplease sign up.
This book was written circa 35 years ago. Do its conclusions still conform with results since collected? Paul Yoward This field has progressed through developments like Niche Construction, the extended theory of evolution – you should see papers by Odling-Smee; The …more This field has progressed through developments like Niche Construction, the extended theory of evolution – you should see papers by Odling-Smee; The EP holds up though and is well worth reading.
See 1 question about The Extended Sxtendido. Lists with This Book.
Jul 12, Krishan rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: The book is a logical continuation of his devastating book The Selfish Gene. Here Dawkins turns his critical eye and razor sharp words to evolutionary views that take the individual organism as the definitive playing field for natural selection to operate. Using the gene’s eye view of life that he developed so well in The Selfish Genehe shows that animal artifacts are better understood as objects engineered by natural selection, rather than as by products of the behavior of organisms.
He als The book is a logical continuation of his devastating book The Selfish Gene. He also makes the case that many phenomena incidental to parasitism and symbiosis are better understood if the organism level view of biological agents is abandoned.
Dawkins’ explores these and similar topics with his characteristic clarity, and the reader is exposed rifhard the full power of evolutionary thinking. A quote often seen on the cover of Dawkins’ books is “Richard Dawkins climbs mental Everests”.
This book illustrates the point and then some. Dawkins concise language is without extedido in the biological sciences. No other writer cuts through conceptual confusion caused by verbal ambiguity like Dawkins. Great but fatiguing Contrary to Dawkin’s most famous “Selfish Gene” this book is much more difficult to read for a non-biologist person.
Some parts required me to google terms definitions and problem backgrounds each paragraph, if not line. Despite of this the whole reading experience is very satisfying. Lot of new concepts that bring up interesting ideas, numerous facts and remarkably great language – all of this teams up to build the great book.
It’s great reading for everyone ready to grind thr Great but fatiguing Contrary to Dawkin’s most famous “Selfish Gene” this book is much more difficult to read for a non-biologist person. It’s great reading for everyone ready to grind through complexities of material. The essentials of life’s story: Biodiversity is more than a buzzword for ecologists.
Variation gives life its grandeur, and Richard Dawkins gives us a description of the workings of variation.
Fortunately, with a sharp mind and sharper wit, he has the ability to deliver this portrayal so that nearly everyone can understand it. That’s not to say this book is an easy read. Although he delivers his narration as if sitting with you in a quiet study, you may still need to review his words more than o The essentials of life’s story: Although he delivers his narration as if sitting with you in a quiet study, you may still need to review his words more than once.
That’s not a challenge or a chore, richzrd a pleasure.
Feb 28, Svetlana rated it it was amazing. The language of the book cannot be called simple and it takes some efforts to follow the authors reasoning, but these efforts will reap big reward. In process of reading you will experience the happiness exyendido discovers time and again, have finished the book you will get another angle of view of the phenomenon of life.
Don’t panic, extend your mind. Oct 16, Pink rated it it was ok. I’m sure this is great, but I’m not a scientist and as one dawkinns Dawkins least accessible books, this one was overkill. It’s an expansion of dawkine covered fdnotipo The Selfish Gene, which I’d previously enjoyed, but there was too much detail for me to take in. I’ll skip back to some of his later books. Mar 24, People say my name should be Jeff rated it really liked it.
I’d give it 5 stars if I knew enough biology to be able to confirm it or 1 if I could refute it. Jan 15, Sheng Peng rated it really liked it. Extendiso upon and more advanced than The Selfish Gene. Re-read this after re-reading The Selfish Gene. It definitely makes more sense to dawkibs this time around. From the get-go, the style of the book is a lot more science-heavy—more jargon, dawkuns in depth scientific ideas and reasoning, which as a scientist myself I enjoyed: Dawkins is terrific at scientific reasoning, and this was a good outing from him, even by his standards.
The problem with the first half maybe ddawkins more of the book, is the content. Dawkins spends a very long time addressing criticism from The Selfish Gene, as well as some criticism with his extended phenotype theorem.
Genetic determinism, group selection, green beards etc. Whilst this is very well done, it shows the age of the book. Almost all of these criticisms are no longer pertinent which shows how correct Dawkins was at the time, might I addextnedido some arguments seem a little trivial. What the first half lacks, Dawkins makes up for in the second half. The theorem of the extended phenotype is a fantastic way of viewing the impact replicators have on the world, and is almost flawless plus, Dawkins addresses the few issues that arise with the theorem.
He even ends with an optimistic view of life, presumably addressing the sadness? Overall, a very good book, but unless you wish to get into the knitty-gritty of many different theories some very pertinent and some a bit lessyou might be best off reading the last few chapters.
Richarrd, the summary of the extended phenotype theorem that Dawkins provides in the recent editions of The Selfish Gene might be a good option. Jul 07, Tien Manh rated it really liked it. The book promotes concepts called replicators genes, DNA and vehicles organisms, groups, species I got to about mid-way through the book, then Dawkins went on a extendldo bash”, and some other academic debates regarding neo?
Not being a scientist myself and having little formal context in evolutionary biology, I got a bit lost. Will retry the latter half of the book in the future! Mar 08, Harry H. Dawkins is a contemporary genius with fresh perspectives in several fields. In this book, Dawkins picks up his selfish gene theme and extends its influence to organs and systems within the body and then to the external environment.
In doing so, Dawkins never strays from his central themes: